Message162309
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, amak, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, hynek, ncoghlan, pmoody, python-dev, sandro.tosi, terry.reedy, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年06月04日.23:41:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1338853320.25.0.406843080392.issue14814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Also noting a TODO item here: currently, the address-producing operations on network objects just produce vanilla address objects of the appropriate version. My question is, should we have those operations create interface objects instead?
My current thought is that the latter would lose less information, since you can easily strip the network details later if desired. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年06月04日 23:42:00 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, amak, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, pmoody, sandro.tosi, tshepang, python-dev, Ramchandra Apte, hynek |
| 2012年06月04日 23:42:00 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1338853320.25.0.406843080392.issue14814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年06月04日 23:41:59 | ncoghlan | link | issue14814 messages |
| 2012年06月04日 23:41:59 | ncoghlan | create |
|