Message162278
| Author |
Alexandre.Zani |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Alexandre.Zani, barry, belopolsky, djc, lemburg, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2012年06月04日.17:33:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1338831189.04.0.931111112346.issue14908@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think the easiest and most intuitive approach is to simply define timestamp() as being the reverse of fromtimestamp(). Don't worry about leap seconds and all that stuff.
If non-1970 epochs are a concern, this could be renamed to posix_timestamp or some such with perhaps a generic timestamp function that takes both a time and epoch.
But let's not let such a useful function not happen just because it won't solve everyone's problem. |
|