Message161861
| Author |
runtux |
| Recipients |
barry, ggenellina, ishimoto, jafo, kael, leromarinvit, phahn, r.david.murray, runtux, tkikuchi, tlynn, tony_nelson |
| Date |
2012年05月29日.09:03:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<20120529090321.GA9377@runtux.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1338236105.18.0.11634262978.issue1079@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:15:05PM +0000, R. David Murray wrote:
>
> R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment:
>
> Ralf, thanks very much for this patch. I'm considering applying it.
> Given that the current code breaks on parsing various legitimate
> constructs, it seems like the behavior change (preserving whitespace
> in the non-EW parts...which IMO is correct) should be an acceptable
> tradeoff.
>
> Could you please submit a contributor agreement?
> (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/)
Thanks for considering my patch.
I've just sent the agreement.
Ralf |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月29日 09:03:28 | runtux | set | recipients:
+ runtux, barry, jafo, ishimoto, tlynn, ggenellina, tkikuchi, tony_nelson, kael, r.david.murray, leromarinvit, phahn |
| 2012年05月29日 09:03:27 | runtux | link | issue1079 messages |
| 2012年05月29日 09:03:27 | runtux | create |
|