Message161807
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
barry, r.david.murray, sdaoden, torsten.becker |
| Date |
2012年05月28日.20:51:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1338238287.27.0.197939348023.issue11783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm finally getting back around to this. Torsten, could you submit a contributor agreement, please? (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/)
And to answer the question you had about the 'still failing' test, parseaddr isn't currently doing the encoded-word decode. Either it should do that too, or it shouldn't do the IDNA decode. I think it should do the decode, because parseaddr and formataddr are supposed to be inverses. And decoding when decoding didn't used to be done seems like a backward compatible change: a program doing its own decoding just won't find anything that needs decoding. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月28日 20:51:27 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, sdaoden, torsten.becker |
| 2012年05月28日 20:51:27 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1338238287.27.0.197939348023.issue11783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月28日 20:51:26 | r.david.murray | link | issue11783 messages |
| 2012年05月28日 20:51:26 | r.david.murray | create |
|