Message161728
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, ajaksu2, barry, r.david.murray, rndblnch |
| Date |
2012年05月27日.20:53:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1338152028.42.0.671032618424.issue1672568@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hmm. Thinking about it, though, that might not work if there are other errors in the message, many of which are more benign. Probably the raise_on_defect control is a little too coarse.
I've been thinking that we need a way to set the policy on an already existing message, which would make this work more usefully. But that's a different issue. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月27日 20:53:48 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, rndblnch, ajaksu2, BreamoreBoy |
| 2012年05月27日 20:53:48 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1338152028.42.0.671032618424.issue1672568@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月27日 20:53:47 | r.david.murray | link | issue1672568 messages |
| 2012年05月27日 20:53:47 | r.david.murray | create |
|