Message161470
| Author |
lesha |
| Recipients |
Giovanni.Bajo, avian, bobbyi, gregory.p.smith, jcea, lesha, neologix, nirai, pitrou, sbt, sdaoden, vinay.sajip, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年05月23日.23:39:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1337816384.1.0.986422970832.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> So what are you suggesting? That a lock of the default type should
> raise an error if you try to acquire it when it has been acquired in a
> previous process?
I was suggesting a way to make 'logging' fork-safe. No more, no less.
Does what my previous comment make sense in light of this?
> Using a generation count
Sure, that's a good idea. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月23日 23:39:44 | lesha | set | recipients:
+ lesha, gregory.p.smith, vinay.sajip, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, nirai, bobbyi, neologix, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, sbt, avian |
| 2012年05月23日 23:39:44 | lesha | set | messageid: <1337816384.1.0.986422970832.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月23日 23:39:43 | lesha | link | issue6721 messages |
| 2012年05月23日 23:39:43 | lesha | create |
|