This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | Aaron.Staley |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Aaron.Staley, alexis, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, jafo, mhammond, runtux, tarek, techtonik |
| Date | 2012年05月22日.02:04:26 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1337652267.06.0.25242548661.issue8954@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I was looking over this patch (as it relates to my bug report: http://bugs.python.org/issue14877?@ok_message=msg%20161314%20created%3Cbr%3Eissue%2014877%20message_count%2C%20messages%20edited%20ok&@template=item) and noticed that this line: + if (not self.distribution.has_ext_modules() and + not self.distribution.has_c_libraries()): + basename = "%s.%s" % (fullname, "win32") I feel it may be better to insert plat_name there if it exists. That way, users can create installers targeted for win-amd64. Why is this needed for a pure python packages? This bug: http://bugs.python.org/issue6792 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012年05月22日 02:04:27 | Aaron.Staley | set | recipients: + Aaron.Staley, mhammond, georg.brandl, jafo, techtonik, tarek, eric.araujo, brian.curtin, alexis, runtux |
| 2012年05月22日 02:04:27 | Aaron.Staley | set | messageid: <1337652267.06.0.25242548661.issue8954@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月22日 02:04:26 | Aaron.Staley | link | issue8954 messages |
| 2012年05月22日 02:04:26 | Aaron.Staley | create | |