Message161001
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
Ringding, belopolsky, dangra, ezio.melotti, lemburg, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, sjmachin, spatz123, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年05月17日.18:52:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1337280930.2462.113.camel@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to |
<1337278376.34.0.260212802109.issue8271@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Changing from 'unexpected end of data' to 'invalid continuation byte' for b'\xe0\x00' is fine with me, but this will be a (minor) deviation from 2.7, 3.1, 3.2, and pypy (it could still be changed on all these except 3.1 though).
I probably poorly said. Past and current implementations raise
'unexpected end of data' and not 'invalid continuation byte'. Test
expects 'invalid continuation byte'. |
|