Message 160950 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	mcjeff
Recipients	loewis, mcjeff, polymorphm
Date	2012年05月17日.03:47:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1337226448.24.0.480273857209.issue14134@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I would think it might make more sense just to make the change to the Transport object. Since there's an argument for a transport on ServerProxy already, that seems more straightforward and keeps the network layer isolated. Otherwise, it seems slightly ambiguous to me. Consider that maybe I passed in a transport and a timeout, why wasn't my timeout honored? Though, I guess use_datetime already behaves that way.

Content

I would think it might make more sense just to make the change to the Transport object. Since there's an argument for a transport on ServerProxy already, that seems more straightforward and keeps the network layer isolated.
Otherwise, it seems slightly ambiguous to me. Consider that maybe I passed in a transport and a timeout, why wasn't my timeout honored? Though, I guess use_datetime already behaves that way.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年05月17日 03:47:28	mcjeff	set	recipients: + mcjeff, loewis, polymorphm
2012年05月17日 03:47:28	mcjeff	set	messageid: <1337226448.24.0.480273857209.issue14134@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年05月17日 03:47:27	mcjeff	link	issue14134 messages
2012年05月17日 03:47:27	mcjeff	create

homepage