Message160745
| Author |
cmn |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, cmn, effbot, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, pjenvey, python-dev, scoder, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年05月15日.18:04:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1337105063.77.0.900573507443.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Hi,
the C implementation of ElementTree do not support namespaces for find/all/... .
To me this is a serious regression, as I rely on ElementTree namespace support, and 3.3 would break it with this change.
Breaking namespace support is a fundamental problem.
Please reconsider this therefore.
Code to reproduced attached - works fine with python 3.2.
As the C implementation of ElementTree and Element lack the namespace keyword for findall (and *all* the other methods),
where namespaces are very important when dealing with xml,
and it is not possible to prevent using the v implementation of ElementTree without changing the python install,
I propose to revert this change.
Until the C implementation can do namespaces as well. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月15日 18:04:23 | cmn | set | recipients:
+ cmn, effbot, scoder, pjenvey, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, eli.bendersky, flox, tshepang, python-dev |
| 2012年05月15日 18:04:23 | cmn | set | messageid: <1337105063.77.0.900573507443.issue13988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月15日 18:04:23 | cmn | link | issue13988 messages |
| 2012年05月15日 18:04:23 | cmn | create |
|