Message160741
| Author |
vinay.sajip |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, maker, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2012年05月15日.16:25:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1337099131.25.0.703330115786.issue11959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> So if we add a map argument to that and only pass it to socket if it
> is non-None, wouldn't that maintain backward compatibility with
> current asyncore behavior?
Sorry I was being a bit dense ... it's been a while since I looked at this. I think you are right that the base create_socket could be changed in this way. I'll work up a patch in my sandbox branch (for easier Rietveld integration). |
|