Message160694
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
cvrebert, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年05月15日.08:26:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1337070390.92.0.205403793137.issue14674@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks for the patch, I left more comments on the review page.
IMHO it would be better to list the differences in a bullet list and expand later, rather than having a section for the parser and one for the generator.
AFAIU the differences are:
* top-level scalar values are accepted/generated;
* inf and nan are accepted/generated;
* unicode strings (rather than utf-8) are produced/consumed;
* duplicate keys are accepted, and the only the last one is used;
You can then add examples and explain "workarounds", either inline or after the list (I don't think it's necessary to add the snippets you posted in the last message though).
> Sidenote: Is there any way to get notified of these reviews?
In theory you should get notifications, in practice it doesn't always work. We are still working on make it better. |
|