Message160670
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Julien.Courteau, alexis, eric.araujo, tarek |
| Date |
2012年05月14日.22:12:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1337033536.16.0.440469218818.issue13400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
FTR I asked Julien to provide his opinion as a user and he agreed that having just one --byte-compile/--no-byte-compile option pair seemed better than the existing names (where --compile and --optimize are unrelated).
I wanted to avoid --byte-compile=0 to generate pyc, because I expected people to interpret it as "disabled" instead of "optimization level 0". Thus the idea of using letters (and avoiding to use c and o as not all VMs have pyc and pyo files).
Note that the new spelling for --compile is the seemingly redundant --byte-compile=b, but that does not matter as it will be the default value so people won’t type it. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月14日 22:12:16 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, tarek, Arfrever, alexis, Julien.Courteau |
| 2012年05月14日 22:12:16 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1337033536.16.0.440469218818.issue13400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月14日 22:12:15 | eric.araujo | link | issue13400 messages |
| 2012年05月14日 22:12:15 | eric.araujo | create |
|