Message160531
| Author |
Paul.Upchurch |
| Recipients |
Paul.Upchurch, eric.araujo, hynek |
| Date |
2012年05月13日.17:31:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1336930293.06.0.72549173506.issue14794@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
That's true; it doesn't work with today's downloads from python.org. The version I tested was win32 but I don't think that should matter. Python has always supported large numbers on 32-bit OSs.
My observations:
[1] Debian Wheezy, python3.2, 3.2.3~rc2-1: Fail
[2] Debian Wheezy, python2.7, 2.7.3~rc2-2.1: Fail
[3] python.org, python3.3, 3.3.0a3: Fail
[4] python.org, python3.2, 3.2.3: Fail
I'll compile 64-bit linux from source and try that.
[1] Python 3.2.3rc2 (default, Mar 21 2012, 06:59:51) [GCC 4.6.3] on linux2
[2] Python 2.7.3rc2 (default, Apr 22 2012, 22:35:38) [GCC 4.6.3] on linux2
[3] Python 3.3.0a3 (default, May 1 2012, 16:25:20) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
[4] Python 3.2.3 (default, Apr 11 2012, 07:15:24) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月13日 17:31:33 | Paul.Upchurch | set | recipients:
+ Paul.Upchurch, eric.araujo, hynek |
| 2012年05月13日 17:31:33 | Paul.Upchurch | set | messageid: <1336930293.06.0.72549173506.issue14794@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月13日 17:31:32 | Paul.Upchurch | link | issue14794 messages |
| 2012年05月13日 17:31:32 | Paul.Upchurch | create |
|