Message160490
| Author |
benjamin.peterson |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, hynek, jcea, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, rosslagerwall, tarek |
| Date |
2012年05月12日.19:52:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAPZV6o-FYTMJQiVSt1Lco_t5TOGQ9NiQ0oGGvfXDQXj0g+pErQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAH_1eM09u-OW-zK5CCpWYkWtSvVea8_JWrpb0qY0mEo3um=G-g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
2012年5月12日 Charles-François Natali <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Charles-François Natali <neologix@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>> It would be nice if the documentation of fwalk() explained why you would
>> want to use it over walk().
>
> How does the attached patch look?
Okay, but explain what a "symlink attack" is. |
|