Message160248
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
larry, mark.dickinson, pitrou |
| Date |
2012年05月09日.06:36:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1336545391.09.0.619149277595.issue14746@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I'm not sure what you're proposing to fix. It seems to save at
> most a couple of lines of (obvious) code?
Well, I *did* specify low priority.
Attached is the patch for what I had in mind.
> At least Py_ssize_t *could* have a different width from "PyObject *".
Not "Py_ssize_t", "Py_ssize_t *". |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年05月09日 06:36:31 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, mark.dickinson, pitrou |
| 2012年05月09日 06:36:31 | larry | set | messageid: <1336545391.09.0.619149277595.issue14746@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年05月09日 06:36:30 | larry | link | issue14746 messages |
| 2012年05月09日 06:36:30 | larry | create |
|