Message160230
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
dmalcolm, eric.snow, pitrou, sbrunthaler, skrah |
| Date |
2012年05月08日.22:00:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<20120508220012.GA14881@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<CA+j1x0k9nb=qYoi9_uaB7taeFLUVyBPJP587V64vM-WgpiNRfA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> > Modules/_decimal/tests/bench.py:
> > --------------------------------
> >
> > Not much change for floats and decimal.py, 8-10% slowdown for _decimal!
>
> This result is not unexpected, as I have no inline cached versions of
> functions using this module. The derivatives I generate work for Long,
> Float and Complex numbers (plus Unicode strings and some others.)
But I couldn't detect a speedup for either float or int in bench.py. Also,
in perf.py I'm consistently getting slower results for float with the patch.
> there is a clear need, of course I can look into that and add these
> derivatives (as I said, there are still some 40+ opcodes unused.)
I'd say that the minimum requirement for a performance enhancement
patch is that there aren't any slowdowns. :)
I'm getting a 9% speedup for mandelbrot and an 18% speedup for spectralnorm.
That's nice, but many benchmarks that Antoine and I have posted show
slowdowns of 15-18%. |
|