Message160018
| Author |
hynek |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, hynek, neologix, pitrou |
| Date |
2012年05月05日.18:54:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4FA57749.1000602@ox.cx> |
| In-reply-to |
<1336240285.82.0.747530639477.issue14082@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> The copyxattr() function should be private (_copyxattr()).
Ok. I presumed that not adding it to __all__ is "private enough".
> For some reason the tests are failing here:
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_copy2_xattr (test.test_shutil.TestShutil)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/antoine/cpython/default/Lib/test/test_shutil.py", line 410, in test_copy2_xattr
> os.setxattr(src, 'user.foo', b'42')
> OSError: [Errno 95] Operation not supported
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_copyxattr (test.test_shutil.TestShutil)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/antoine/cpython/default/Lib/test/test_shutil.py", line 296, in test_copyxattr
> os.setxattr(src, 'user.foo', b'42')
> OSError: [Errno 95] Operation not supported
Looks like your file system Python uses for tmp files doesn't support
xattr. That's bad because you can't verify. How should I cope with that?
try/catch on the first setxattr() and skip the test if it fails? Is the
an official way to do that? |
|