Message159793
| Author |
cbenoit |
| Recipients |
cbenoit, eric.araujo, tarek |
| Date |
2012年05月02日.12:41:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CADvsTj7GO+57-=MeLm=mubPdZdFaAG-ExZM99LOuBEt6Urw-jw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1335052176.77.0.973379319144.issue14517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
2012年4月22日 Éric Araujo <report@bugs.python.org>
>
> Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment:
>
> Is it #5372?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14517>
> _______________________________________
>
Yes, I think so. The problem is :
For modules with a lot of .c, recompiling everything can take a very long
time...
In fact, it becomes very cumbersome for me and my co-workers...
Is there a way to make the previous check on timestamps optional? |
|