Message159792
| Author |
hynek |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, hynek, neologix, pitrou |
| Date |
2012年05月02日.12:07:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4FA12389.9030405@ox.cx> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAH_1eM1iqUB7iNE7=XBp8rbOavY9MR8PfE+yKMe32z40ibctrg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> I really like the idea of adding extended attributes copy to shutil.cop2().
> However, I'm not convinced that exposing the raw copyxattr() is
> necessary (I can't really come up with a use case for this).
>
> So I'd suggest make copyxattr() private, and wait until someone asks
> for the functionality.
I agree. If someone needs it, (s)he will be able to advice on useful
semantics re replacement. For copy2() it’s a non-issue. |
|