Message159606
| Author |
dov |
| Recipients |
dov |
| Date |
2012年04月29日.13:39:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1335706773.33.0.354595880346.issue14693@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Python has its own implementations of various hash functions, that can be used as fallbacks when openssl is not available. However, if openssl *is* available at build time, then these fallbacks don't get built.
It would be nice if they would get built even if openssl *was* found at build time:
(1) for (perceived?) licensing issues, one might choose to run without linking with openssl (see http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109053.html; that message requests that a bug be opened about this, but I wasn't able to find it?)
(2) for "portable" builds: build onto portable or shared storage, and run on multiple machines, even if openssl happens not to be available on some of the machines. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年04月29日 13:39:33 | dov | set | recipients:
+ dov |
| 2012年04月29日 13:39:33 | dov | set | messageid: <1335706773.33.0.354595880346.issue14693@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年04月29日 13:39:32 | dov | link | issue14693 messages |
| 2012年04月29日 13:39:32 | dov | create |
|