Message159134
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, jcea, loewis, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年04月24日.11:53:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1335268588.2400.44.camel@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to |
<1335266526.6.0.822959979186.issue14654@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I'm -1 on using signed char in the implementation.
I completely agree with you, for these and for other not mentioned
reasons. So I don't released this patch yesterday, and did not suggest
it to accept. I showed him just out of curiosity -- whether the effect
is stronger on a 64-bit platform? Although this technique will not be
accepted, it sets the bar that can be achieved (if it's worth it). |
|