Message159069
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Hobson.Lane, Roman.Evstifeev, benjamin.peterson, cvrebert, eric.araujo, ganadist, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, smarnach, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年04月23日.19:47:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1335210380.3411.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1335209822.04.0.639614091885.issue3177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I'm not a lawyer (duh), but my understanding is that *looking* at GPL
> code (as opposed to proprietary code, where someone might sue you
> about it and not looking is a good defense) is OK, you just can't copy
> it.
You could probably copy a one- or two-liner, especially if it's not a
very creative one.
By that I mean that putting "i = i + 1" under the GPL is not enough to
prevent anyone else to write the same line of code :-) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年04月23日 19:47:41 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ganadist, Arfrever, r.david.murray, cvrebert, rosslagerwall, smarnach, Roman.Evstifeev, Hobson.Lane |
| 2012年04月23日 19:47:40 | pitrou | link | issue3177 messages |
| 2012年04月23日 19:47:40 | pitrou | create |
|