Message158856
| Author |
jcea |
| Recipients |
aklauer, amaury.forgeotdarc, jcea, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年04月20日.17:30:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1334943043.18.0.207650127403.issue10142@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Terry, yes, skiping the test in the code will raise an error anyway when doing the real "seek()" OS syscall.
> Is there a reason to say (several times) 'can support' instead of
> just 'support'? Do the OSes in question just optionally support
> rather than always support?
Sometimes depends of the concrete filesystem used, or the concrete OS version.
> The first version added: change 'depend of' to 'depend on'.
Done in my repository. Thanks.
> Could import of io create set of valid_whences for system?
> Then check would be "if whence not in valid_whences:" (or C
> equivalent).
This is far from trivial and I don't see the point if OS "seek()" is going to give an error anyway. The only point would to provide a maybe more useful error message.
> In 3.3, unittest has new mock submodule. Perhaps that would help
> testing.
This is a very thin layer over the OS.
Thanks for the feedback. |
|