homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients loewis, mark.dickinson, michael.foord, rye, vstinner
Date 2012年04月18日.12:58:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1334753888.3.0.257360506338.issue14613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> time.time() can return None, or sometimes NaN
It is possible that it returns NaN, but it cannot return None. time.time() implementation of Python 2.7:
static PyObject *
time_time(PyObject *self, PyObject *unused)
{
 double secs;
 secs = floattime();
 if (secs == 0.0) {
 PyErr_SetFromErrno(PyExc_IOError);
 return NULL;
 }
 return PyFloat_FromDouble(secs);
}
FYI I removed the (secs == 0.0) check in Python 3.3 (issue #14368, changeset 206c45f45236), it was a bug. time.time() *cannot* fail, it always return a float.
History
Date User Action Args
2012年04月18日 12:58:08vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, loewis, mark.dickinson, michael.foord, rye
2012年04月18日 12:58:08vstinnersetmessageid: <1334753888.3.0.257360506338.issue14613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年04月18日 12:58:07vstinnerlinkissue14613 messages
2012年04月18日 12:58:07vstinnercreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /