Message158462
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
Robert.Elsner, mark.dickinson, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年04月16日.15:06:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1334588806.96.0.704570792248.issue14596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Or perhaps not care at all?
That's also possible. :-) IMO, Robert's use-case doesn't really match the intended use-case for struct (parsing structures of values laid out like a C-struct ). There the caching makes sense. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年04月16日 15:06:46 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, Robert.Elsner |
| 2012年04月16日 15:06:46 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1334588806.96.0.704570792248.issue14596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年04月16日 15:06:46 | mark.dickinson | link | issue14596 messages |
| 2012年04月16日 15:06:46 | mark.dickinson | create |
|