Message158441
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, ezio.melotti, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skrah |
| Date |
2012年04月16日.13:25:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4F8C1DC4.6010400@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1334515693.42.0.543675526996.issue14339@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> (1) The patch appears to assume that a Unicode string created with
> PyUnicode_New(size, 127) will have 'kind' PyUnicode_1BYTE_KIND.
> While this might be true in the current implementation, I don't know
> whether this is guaranteed in general. Martin, any comments on
> this?
There is a guarantee that the shortest form must always be used.
So as long as the Unicode representation doesn't fundamentally change
again, this property is indeed guaranteed. |
|