Message157691
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, pitrou, terry.reedy, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年04月06日.21:32:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333747937.96.0.638295527547.issue14468@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree, for reasons stated. Having to skip over the wrong instructions made getting started a bit harder for me. I also think TortoiseHG should get more than just a mention. The initial re-creation of the recent DAG for each branch when starting up Workbench takes some time, but having the graph makes it immediately obvious whether the repository is in a proper state -- two heads for default and 2.7, three for 3.2 -- both before starting work after pulling from py.org and again when ready to push changes back. |
|