Message 157649 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	Mark.Shannon
Recipients	Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jcon, pitrou, pjenvey, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date	2012年04月06日.07:58:03
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1333699083.97.0.0185704862547.issue13903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
How about changing the method-cache size in a separate patch? On my machine, reducing the method-cache size from 210 to 29 results in a very small improvement in performance (with the original dict). That way we don't get a performance regression with the new dict and the patch is better focussed.

Content

How about changing the method-cache size in a separate patch?
On my machine, reducing the method-cache size from 2**10 to 2**9 results
in a very small improvement in performance (with the original dict). 
That way we don't get a performance regression with the new dict 
and the patch is better focussed.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年04月06日 07:58:04	Mark.Shannon	set	recipients: + Mark.Shannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, pjenvey, benjamin.peterson, jcon, Jim.Jewett
2012年04月06日 07:58:03	Mark.Shannon	set	messageid: <1333699083.97.0.0185704862547.issue13903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年04月06日 07:58:03	Mark.Shannon	link	issue13903 messages
2012年04月06日 07:58:03	Mark.Shannon	create

homepage