Message157643
| Author |
Jim.Jewett |
| Recipients |
Jim.Jewett, docs@python, georg.brandl, pitrou, python-dev, sandro.tosi |
| Date |
2012年04月06日.04:59:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CA+OGgf7OYFVhEAznD4xZKJwg1WKxo7KWNXAtmKSvpPjSJFs5Bw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1333661578.3326.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Content |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
> Not sure what you're talking about. The doc patch is about unacquired
> locks, not locks that someone else (another thread) holds.
Isn't one common reason for not being able to acquire a lock that
someone else was already holding it? |
|