Message157617
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, asvetlov, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年04月05日.20:20:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333656905.3326.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1333657069.47.0.77304833554.issue14417@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Without a termination condition, how is this different from just
> reverting the original change?
The difference is that it's a (presumably interruptible) infinite loop,
not a stack overflow. There's no crash and therefore no security issue. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年04月05日 20:20:24 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, vstinner, Arfrever, r.david.murray, asvetlov, skrah, Jim.Jewett |
| 2012年04月05日 20:20:23 | pitrou | link | issue14417 messages |
| 2012年04月05日 20:20:23 | pitrou | create |
|