Message157422
| Author |
brian.curtin |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, brian.curtin, pitrou, tim.golden |
| Date |
2012年04月03日.14:19:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333462800.02.0.13573522206.issue14484@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I can't find where we talked about this, maybe just IRC, but that's there (perhaps poorly) as a special case.
0 is 0, but signal.CTRL_C_EVENT is also 0. We try the signal version first then fall back to TerminateProcess.
I was just looking at this myself and it's not great. I actually wish we could change what signal.CTRL_C_EVENT means, or maybe add a flag to determine if the second parameter is supposed to be a return code or a signal? I'm open to anything. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年04月03日 14:20:00 | brian.curtin | set | recipients:
+ brian.curtin, pitrou, tim.golden, asvetlov |
| 2012年04月03日 14:20:00 | brian.curtin | set | messageid: <1333462800.02.0.13573522206.issue14484@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年04月03日 14:19:59 | brian.curtin | link | issue14484 messages |
| 2012年04月03日 14:19:59 | brian.curtin | create |
|