Message157376
| Author |
Jimbofbx |
| Recipients |
Jimbofbx, jcea, serhiy.storchaka, skrah |
| Date |
2012年04月02日.19:36:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333395384.26.0.71699867406.issue14478@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
If I increase the cycles increased 10x with 3.2 I get:
int: 0.4219999313354492
Decimal: 24.20299983024597
CachingDecimal: 1.7809998989105225
The sample you have provided is basically what I'm using. See attached
What about worst case hash calculation time for Decimal? How does the C code handle that? This is if I increase the values themselves by 100x, same number of loops as above
int: 0.5309998989105225
CachingDecimal: 2.078000068664551
Decimal: 41.2979998588562 |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年04月02日 19:36:24 | Jimbofbx | set | recipients:
+ Jimbofbx, jcea, skrah, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2012年04月02日 19:36:24 | Jimbofbx | set | messageid: <1333395384.26.0.71699867406.issue14478@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年04月02日 19:36:23 | Jimbofbx | link | issue14478 messages |
| 2012年04月02日 19:36:23 | Jimbofbx | create |
|