Message157308
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, pitrou |
| Date |
2012年04月01日.16:01:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333295768.3449.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1333295975.69.0.627020030564.issue14466@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I, for one, use both uncommitted-changes and named branches; the
> former is easiest, but the latter safer: if I screw up a merge in a
> clone where I use a named branch, I can revert and retry the merge,
> but if I screw up merging pulled changes with my uncommitted edits, I
> risk losing them.
I think uncommitted changes is fine for a simple introduction.
hg experts can use whatever they want without needing our help. |
|