Message157280
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
elsdoerfer, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, ubershmekel |
| Date |
2012年04月01日.12:20:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333282537.3449.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1333282486.34.0.300291546851.issue13968@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I found this comprehensive description of the '**' convention at
> http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/2809/Recursive-patterned-File-Globbing that can translate directly to unittests.
>
> I'd like to fix the patch for these specs but should it be in a new
> rglob function or in the existing glob.glob()? I think it should be a
> new one to avoid any edge-case compatibility concerns even though on
> face value there shouldn't be any.
I think it should be the existing glob.glob(). We won't introduce a new
function any time we add a new syntactic feature in the glob
mini-language. |
|