Message157040
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
anacrolix, eric.araujo, michael.foord, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2012年03月29日.13:21:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1333027301.94.0.338022925176.issue14408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I guess I'm not really done talking about this, though my bow to you as maintainer still stands.
The mixin tests *can't* be run in isolation, that's the whole point. Otherwise you could just let unittest run them, and wouldn't need to mark them as not-really-a-TestCase. The typical mixin test class uses attributes that don't exist except on the concrete TestCases, so I'm not sure why calling methods that don't exist on the mixin is any worse :) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月29日 13:21:41 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, eric.araujo, michael.foord, anacrolix |
| 2012年03月29日 13:21:41 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1333027301.94.0.338022925176.issue14408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月29日 13:21:41 | r.david.murray | link | issue14408 messages |
| 2012年03月29日 13:21:41 | r.david.murray | create |
|