Message156983
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
anacrolix, eric.araujo, michael.foord, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2012年03月28日.15:44:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1332949490.34.0.73394783725.issue14408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Your presumption is probably correct, however if that is the premise of the patch it is incorrect in detail, since we've already fixed test_queue specifically to be runnable with -m unittest without adding a load_tests. I haven't looked at the other modules Matt is looking at, but it may well be that they can also be fixed without a load_tests.
The test_queue fix is issue 14333, also opened by Matt, but fixed by Michele.
I think we should make the tests runnable by unittest, but that we should use load_tests only if making discovery work for a particular test is too invasive. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月28日 15:44:50 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, eric.araujo, michael.foord, anacrolix |
| 2012年03月28日 15:44:50 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1332949490.34.0.73394783725.issue14408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月28日 15:44:49 | r.david.murray | link | issue14408 messages |
| 2012年03月28日 15:44:49 | r.david.murray | create |
|