Message156966
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
alexis, eric.araujo, gjb1002, tarek |
| Date |
2012年03月28日.04:22:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1332908541.38.0.460687251947.issue10374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I now think that this should be fixed in d1 too. We could just always rebuild scripts (it’s just a file copy), or implement the matching idea from my previous message.
To answer my own question:
> Or is there a rule that says build_* command only look at timetamps to decide that?
I think a command is free to do whatever inspection it needs to determine is something needs rebuilding.
Tests would need to exercise both the --executable option of build_scripts and default value. Thankfully the code uses sys.executable and we can inject a custom value in a test. Adding the easy keyword, I think this is a good candidate for the upcoming Montreal sprint. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月28日 04:22:21 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, gjb1002, tarek, alexis |
| 2012年03月28日 04:22:21 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1332908541.38.0.460687251947.issue10374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月28日 04:22:20 | eric.araujo | link | issue10374 messages |
| 2012年03月28日 04:22:20 | eric.araujo | create |
|