Message156796
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月26日.03:10:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.001397236 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1332731456.1.0.21383185622.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
[haypo]
> dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type.
+1
> We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type.
+1
> Or it may be exposed in a module like collections.
Please don't use collections as a dumping ground for this sort of thing. |
|