Message156789
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月25日.23:54:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.7479746e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1332719665.2.0.970084686701.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> It's clutter and we should show some restraint before adding new types.
dictproxy() doesn't need to be a public builtin type. We can just implement its constructor without documenting the type. Or it may be exposed in a module like collections. |
|