Message156785
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
Jim.Jewett, eric.snow, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月25日.23:32:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.0379997e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1332718359.14.0.986981909085.issue14386@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I believe it was actually Guido who suggested exposing dict_proxy, in response to Victor (but independent of Victor's needs, if I understood the message correctly).
It has always seemed odd to me ("always" referring my time working with Python3, of course) that a class that implements the mapping protocol has no way to return the same type of objects that real dict methods do. |
|