Message156751
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
georg.brandl, jcea, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, michael.foord, pitrou, rhettinger, sbt |
| Date |
2012年03月25日.12:02:37 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.4918412e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1332676958.35.0.966566085206.issue14288@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> The thing to emphasise here is that pickling an iterator is
> "destructive": afterwards the original iterator will be "empty".
If you look at the patch it isn't (or shouldn't be).
I agree with Raymond that accumulating dict and set iterators in a list is a bit weird. That said, with hash randomization, perhaps we can't do any better (the order of elements in the internal table depends on the process-wide hash seed). |
|