Message156364
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, eric.araujo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, maubp, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, shaurz, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月19日.22:03:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
7.873145e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1332194634.57.0.81173598402.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Revision 7 of my patch. Incorporates all suggestions from Georg. Added "as an integer" in the docs to make Antoine happy.
If I fail to create the "billion" int in INITFUNC, I return NULL and leak references. I figure this is fine, as a) the other such tests in this function also leak, and b) if you can't initialize the os module, you're not going to have a very productive session.
Dare I dream that it's ready for checkin? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月19日 22:03:55 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, maubp, shaurz, rosslagerwall, python-dev |
| 2012年03月19日 22:03:54 | larry | set | messageid: <1332194634.57.0.81173598402.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月19日 22:03:54 | larry | link | issue14127 messages |
| 2012年03月19日 22:03:53 | larry | create |
|