Message156338
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
bethard, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年03月19日.13:05:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
4.600764e-13 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1332162343.57.0.59473390537.issue14034@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Rather than "is recommended by at least one core CPython developer" I'd say "matches the way the CPython executable handles its own verbosity argument" (check the output of "python --help")
Also, a better fix for the non-orderable types problem is to use "default=0" when defining the verbosity arg rather than changing the test in the code.
Finally, the "not a superset" problem that I have with the way the running example uses its verbosity argument is that it uses it to *change* the message that gets displayed, instead of using it to *display more messages* at higher verbosity levels.
From that point of view, more idiomatic usage might look something like:
if verbosity >= 2:
print("Running {!r}".format(self.__file__)
if verbosity >= 1:
print("Calculating {}^2".format(args.square)
print(answer)
However, I'll grant that things like test runners do use their verbosity argument to switch from shorthand progress markers to printing out the test names and results, so I can live with the examples as they are. |
|