Message156325
| Author |
tshepang |
| Recipients |
bethard, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年03月19日.10:50:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.8902018e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<CAA77j2AhPzLi=caR3ccQ47NeNZRgGAZ2iGhJpSPCug6VE9hL7w@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAA77j2CPKe4F4CVOce5U21KvyTWhiFtDytRNTY2NjqHZXFnhDw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> After playing a bit more with this and thinking about it a bit, I do
> get your point. It makes a lot of sense. I will attach a patch soon,
> which will also include the count keyword. Thanks for the review.
Find attached. Note that I kept some of those anti-pattern examples
you mentioned, and then later on introduced your preferred way of
doing things (using action="count" and ">=" checks instead of "=="
ones). |
|