Message156321
| Author |
tshepang |
| Recipients |
bethard, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年03月19日.08:34:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
1.796896e-13 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<CAA77j2Di0WCnOTihiq=mVCkDt4EO1KV5tGZkLfAN-rYONSixQg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1332130663.43.0.872734730459.issue14034@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> A couple of thoughts on the draft HOWTO:
>
> I like the "verbosity" example, but I'd also like to see it continue on into introducing the "action='count'" alternative that allows "-vv" to set the verbosity level to 2, etc.
I wonder if this usage is common enough to get an entry in this
introductory text.
> I also find the idea of having higher verbosity levels that aren't supersets of lower verbosity levels to be an anti-pattern, so I'd prefer not to see it in an official HOWTO. To my mind, verbosity levels should be checked with ">=", never "==".
I don't really understand this paragraph. Do you have an example to
compare with any of the examples in the attached patch? |
|