Message 155619 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	skrah
Recipients	eric.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, python-dev, samuel.iseli, skrah
Date	2012年03月13日.14:48:13
SpamBayes Score	0.00011547509
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<20120313144812.GA15591@sleipnir.bytereef.org>
In-reply-to	<20120313143505.GA15416@sleipnir.bytereef.org>

Content
Stefan Krah <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet@bytereef.org> added the comment: > > Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e9b52ceh(v=vs.100).aspx > > Question 1: when doing __control87_2(new, mask, &old, NULL), does the > > resulting value in old reflect the new FPU state or the old one? > > The new one, but I had to test that manually (see below). Well of course, unless both new and mask are 0, in which case it's the existing state.

Content

Stefan Krah <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> 
> Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet@bytereef.org> added the comment:
> 
> Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e9b52ceh(v=vs.100).aspx
> > Question 1: when doing __control87_2(new, mask, &old, NULL), does the
> > resulting value in old reflect the *new* FPU state or the old one?
> 
> The new one, but I had to test that manually (see below).
Well of course, unless both new and mask are 0, in which case it's
the existing state.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年03月13日 14:48:16	skrah	set	recipients: + skrah, jcea, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, python-dev, samuel.iseli
2012年03月13日 14:48:13	skrah	link	issue13889 messages
2012年03月13日 14:48:13	skrah	create

homepage