Message155550
| Author |
eric.araujo |
| Recipients |
alexis, eric.araujo, paul.moore, t2y, tarek |
| Date |
2012年03月13日.01:15:56 |
| SpamBayes Score |
2.9511737e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1331601358.95.0.594505967073.issue14002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
[Paul]
> To what? The individual packages?
No, I meant distutils2 bugs. I will open them when I get a minute. You’re right that projects using metadata 1.0 or 1.1 don’t have to use a version conforming to PEP 386, and that packaging should warn when using the create and install actions and the check command, not when iterating over installed distributions.
[Tetsuya Morimoto]
> I made a patch which checks the "func_name" attribute of function before it refers. It
> works for me. However, I wonder if a function has both "func.im_self" and
> "func.func_name"? Tell me the background because I'm newbie for distutils2.
It’s not really a distutils2 detail but a general Python thing: functions and methods have these func_name (or __name__ in Python 3) attributes, and the somewhat complicated code in distutils2.pypi uses them to do its thing. Alexis intends to clean up that code a bit and we’ll also need more tests. If you’re new to distutils2, I think this bug is not easy or fun enough and you would have more luck working on another one. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月13日 01:15:59 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, paul.moore, tarek, alexis, t2y |
| 2012年03月13日 01:15:58 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1331601358.95.0.594505967073.issue14002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月13日 01:15:58 | eric.araujo | link | issue14002 messages |
| 2012年03月13日 01:15:56 | eric.araujo | create |
|