Message155525
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
nicholas.riley, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月12日.23:36:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0008629451 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1331595380.72.0.717986946814.issue14277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
time.monotonic() has 3 implementations:
* Windows: QueryPerformanceCounter() with QueryPerformanceFrequency()
* Mac OS X: mach_absolute_time() with mach_timebase_info()
* UNIX: clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW) or clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
QueryPerformanceFrequency() returns the frequency "in counts per second" according to the doc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms644905(v=vs.85).aspx
mach_absolute_time() with mach_timebase_info() returns a number of seconds, but Python uses *1e-9.
clock_gettime() uses a timespec structure and Python uses *1e-9.
It looks like to mention that time.monotonic() unit is seconds. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年03月12日 23:36:20 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, nicholas.riley |
| 2012年03月12日 23:36:20 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1331595380.72.0.717986946814.issue14277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年03月12日 23:36:20 | vstinner | link | issue14277 messages |
| 2012年03月12日 23:36:19 | vstinner | create |
|