Message154872
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, gvanrossum, larry, loewis, pitrou, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年03月04日.00:50:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.0075001735 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1330822016.3362.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1330822118.97.0.901425898721.issue14127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I grant you that (int, float) is probably, theoretically better than
> (int, int). But it's academic as Guido has ruled against anything but
> a straight int representing nanoseconds, and I doubt he's gonna change
> his mind.
Why not let Guido speak out? |
|